This section includes examples of relevant international initiatives and activities, as well as general resources for specific topics.
6. Resources
6.1 International initiatives and activities
Some examples of relevant international initiatives and activities are as follows:
- In the UK, reports have been produced by several organisations including the Royal Society,1 the Wellcome Trust,2 the Russell Group3 and the Nuffield Council for Bioethics.4 These reports have informed the UK Government’s Research and development people and culture strategy, published in 2021.5 This strategy sets out initial actions in three priority areas – people, culture and talent.
- UK Research and Innovation’s (UKRI) approach to supporting a healthy research and innovation culture encompasses actions on open research; bullying and harassment; research integrity; research and innovation culture; equality, diversity and inclusion; and preventing harm in research and innovation.6 UKRI’s approach in the area of research innovation and culture is multifaceted and incudes reflecting on its own systems and processes, how these influence the wider system, and improving its understanding of how it can support the whole research and innovation community to create environments that support a positive culture.
- Science Europe produced a Statement on Research Culture - Empowering Researchers with a Thriving Research System (2021), which focusses on the quality of research and its processes, supports scientific freedom, and promotes social diversity and inclusion, acknowledging that these conditions will, in turn, foster a productive research system.7
- In 2022, Science Europe launched a Values framework for the organisation of research as a guide to foster a forward-looking research culture within the European Research Area and8 Values include autonomy/freedom; care and collegiality; collaboration; equality, diversity and inclusion; integrity and ethics; and openness and transparency.
- The National Institutes of Health (USA) is implementing recommendations from a working group report on changing the culture to end sexual harassment in scientific research settings, which was published in 2019.9
- The University of Cambridge Data Champion program.10
- Reproducibility and Research Integrity (2023). UK Parliament House of Commons Committee Report.11
6.2 Resources
This section provides information about general resources for particular topics, which complement the specific references provided throughout the Guide. The webpage links for these resources are current at the time of publication.
6.2.1 Values
Topic | Link |
---|---|
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian code for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes, 2013 (updated 2021). Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. | Australian code for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes | NHMRC |
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council and Universities Australia. Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research, 2018. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. | Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research 2018 | NHMRC |
National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council and Universities Australia. National Statement on ethical conduct in human research, 2023. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra. | National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research | NHMRC |
AIATSIS Code of Ethics for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research. | Code of Ethics | AIATSIS |
Science Europe. A values framework for the organisation of research. | Values Framework for the Organisation of Research | Science Europe |
6.2.2 Approaches to implementing institutional change
Topic | Link |
---|---|
Exchanges: The Interdisciplinary Research Journal 11(3) (Summer 2024). Special Issue: Research culture. | Vol. 11 No. 3 (2024): Special Issue: Research Culture | Exchanges: The Interdisciplinary Research Journal |
ACOLA (2023). Research Assessment in Australia: Evidence for Modernisation. A report to the Office of the Chief Scientist. Australian Government, Canberra. | Modernising Research Assessment | ACOLA |
The Embassy of Good Science. | The Embassy of Good Science |
6.2.3 Role modelling and leadership
Topic | Link |
---|---|
Anderson WP. Trust in Medical Research: what scientists must do to enhance it. (2023) Monash University. Monograph. | Trust in Medical Research: What Scientists Must Do to Enhance It | Monash University |
Bulat A. The UCL Good Supervision Guide: A guide for new and experienced supervisors. University College London (2018). | The UCL Good Supervision Guide | University College London |
Farkas AH, Bonifacino E, Turner R, Tilstra SA, Corbelli JA. Mentorship of Women in Academic Medicine: A Systematic Review. J Gen Intern Med. (2019) Jul;34(7):1322-1329 | Mentorship of Women in Academic Medicine: a Systematic Review | Journal of General Internal Medicines |
SOPs4RI consortium. Guidelines for research institutions on supervision and mentoring, Online version 1 (2021). | Developing SOPs and guidelines | OSF |
The Royal Society. Integrity in practice toolkit. | Integrity in practice toolkit | The Royal Society |
UKRIO UK Research Integrity Office. Research Integrity Champions, Leads and Advisers. | Research Integrity Champions, Leads & Advisers | UK Research Integrity Office |
6.2.4 Education and training
Topic | Link |
---|---|
ARRIVE guidelines- a checklist of recommendations to improve the reporting of research involving animals. | ARRIVE Guidelines |
Australian Council of Graduate Research. Good Practice Guidelines, Good Practice Framework for Research Training. (2012). | Good Practice | ACGR |
C4R Community for Rigor. A free, open resource to help researchers of all kinds learn, practice and promote scientific rigour. | Community for Rigor |
Equator Network- provides links to reporting guidelines for the main study types. | Reporting guidelines | EQUATOR Network |
European Commission, Directorate-General for Environment. Caring for animals aiming for better science. Directive 2010/63/EU on protection of animals used for scientific purposes: education and training framework. Publications Office (2018). | Caring for animals aiming for better science | Publications Office of the EU |
FORRT: Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training. A community-driven organisation for educators who wish to integrate open and reproducible science principles into their teaching. | FORRT - Framework for Open and Reproducible Research Training |
PREPARE: Planning Research and Experimental Procedures on Animals: Recommendations for Excellence. | PREPARE |
6.2.5 Institutional resources
Topic | Link |
---|---|
Center for Open Science: TOP Guidelines. Transparency and Open Promotion Guidelines for journals that can be used by authors, reviewers, editors, readers, publishers and funders. | TOP Guidelines | Center for Open Science |
RRIDs: Research Resource Identification. Research Resource Identifiers are ID numbers assigned to help researchers cite key resources in the biomedical literature to improve transparency of research methods. | Research Resource Identifier |
SOPs4RI Consortium. Research Integrity tools for RPOs. | Tools For RPOs | SOPs4RI |
TIDieR: Template for Intervention Description and Replication. A guide and reporting checklist for authors of any study design that evaluates an intervention, and for journal peer reviewers and editors, that has been developed to improve the completeness of reporting and the replicability of interventions. | TIDieR |
UK Parliament. Reproducibility and research integrity: Sixth report of session 2022-23. | Reproducibility and Research Integrity | UK Parliament |
6.2.6 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander researchers
Topic | Link |
---|---|
AIATSIS Code of Ethics for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Research Guide to Applying the AIATSIS Code of Ethics. | Code of Ethics | AIATSIS |
CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance. | CARE Principles | Global Indigenous Data Alliance |
Close the Gap Foundation. Cohort-Based Learning. Cohort -Based Learning emphasises collaboration, inclusivity, and group discussion within a group of students or individuals. | Cohort-Based Learning | Close the Gap Foundation |
NHMRC Workshop report: Strengthening and growing capacity and capability of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health researchers. Melbourne University Business School, 16-17 May 2018 | Capacity and capability building and strengthening | NHMRC |
NHMRC Ethical conduct in research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and communities: Guidelines for researchers and stakeholders (2018). Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra | Ethical guidelines for research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples | NHMRC |
NHMRC. Keeping research on track II: A companion document to Ethical conduct in research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and communities: Guidelines for researchers and stakeholders (2018). Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra | Ethical guidelines for research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples | NHMRC |
Policy Brief: August 2020. We are working for our people: Growing and strengthening the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health workforce: The Career Pathways Project. The Lowitja Institute. Vic. | Career Pathways Project Report: We Are Working for Our People | The Lowitja Institute |
Universities Australia. Indigenous Strategy 2022-25. | Indigenous Strategy 2022-25 | Universities Australia |
6.2.7 Rewards and recognition
Topic | Link |
---|---|
ACOLA (2023). Research Assessment in Australia: Evidence for Modernisation. A report to the Office of the Chief Scientist. Australian Government, Canberra | Modernising Research Assessment | ACOLA |
Centre for Open Science (2022). Supporting open science in the promotion and tenure process: lessons from the University of Maryland. Webinar. | Supporting Open Science in the Promotion and Tenure Process: Lessons from the University of Maryland Webinar | Centre for Open Science |
Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment (CoARA). | CoARA – Coalition for Advancing Research Assessment |
DORA. San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. Resources available include:
| Read the Declaration | DORA |
European Commission (2022). Einstein Foundation Award for Promoting Quality in Research. | Einstein Foundation Award for Promoting Quality in Research | EURAXESS |
European Commission (2022). Open Research Europe. Reforming research assessment: what does it mean for Open Research Europe? | Reforming research assessment: what does it mean for Open Research Europe? | European Commission |
Hong Kong Principles | Hong Kong Principles | WCRIF - The World Conferences on Research Integrity Foundation |
Science Europe (2022). The Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment. | The Agreement on Reforming Research Assessment is now final | Science Europe |
Science Europe (2020). Position Statement and Recommendations on Research Assessment Processes. | Position Statement and Recommendations on Research Assessment Processes | Science Europe |
UK Reproducibility Network (2021). UKRN Statement on rewards and Incentives for Open Research. | UKRN Statement on Rewards and Incentives for Open Research | OSF Preprints |
University of Maryland, Department of Psychology. Departmental Policies and Initiatives. | Department Policies and Initiatives | University of Maryland, Department of Psychology |
Wellcome Trust. Guidance for research organisations on how to implement responsible and fair approaches for research assessment. | Guidance for research organisations on how to implement responsible and fair approaches for research assessment | Wellcome |
6.2.8 Communication
Topic | Link |
---|---|
Concordat on Openness on animal research in the UK. | Openness in animal research communications | Concordat on Openness on Animal Research in the UK |
SOPs4RI Consortium. Toolbox for Research Integrity | Toolbox | SOPs4RI |
Wellcome Trust. Guidance for research organisations on how to implement responsible and fair approaches for research assessment. | Guidance for research organisations on how to implement responsible and fair approaches for research assessment | Wellcome |
6.2.9 Monitoring, evaluation and reporting
Topic | Link |
---|---|
Australian Government- The Treasury. Australian Centre for Evaluation and Evaluation toolkit. | Australian Centre for Evaluation |
Better Evaluation, a part of the Global Evaluation Initiative, provides many useful resources. | Better Evaluation |
Stanford Medicine. Stanford Program on Research Rigor & Responsibility. Monitoring and Accountability. | Monitoring | Stanford Program on Research Rigor & Reproducibility | Stanford Medicine |
State government resources, for example, the NSW Government: Evaluation resource hub. | Evaluation resource hub | NSW Government |
1 The Royal Society (UK) – Research culture. Accessed 21 Nov 2023 from: https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/research-culture/
2 Wellcome Trust. Guidance for research organisations on how to implement responsible and fair approaches for research assessment [Internet]. Accessed 22 Nov 2023 from https://wellcome.org/grant-funding/guidance/open-access-guidance/research-organisations-how-implement-responsible-and-fair-approaches-research
3 Russell Group. Realising Our Potential Report 2021, and Research Culture and Environment Toolkit. 2022. [Internet]. Accessed 22 Nov 2023 from: https://russellgroup.ac.uk/policy/publications/realising-our-potential-backing-talent-and-strengthening-uk-research-culture-and-environment/
4 Nuffield Council on Bioethics. The culture of scientific research in the UK. 2014.[Internet]. Accessed 22 Nov 2023 from: https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/publications/the-culture-of-scientific-research
5 UK Government. Research and development (R&D) people and culture strategy. 2021 Jul 22. [Internet]. Accessed 22 Nov 2023 from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/research-and-development-rd-people-and-culture-strategy
6 UK Research and Innovation. Supporting a healthy research and innovation culture. [Internet]. Accessed 22 Nov 2023 from: https://www.ukri.org/what-we-do/supporting-healthy-research-and-innovation-culture/
7 Science Europe. Statement on Research Culture - Empowering Researchers with a Thriving Research System 2021. [Internet]. Accessed 21 Jun 2023 from: https://scienceeurope.org/our-resources/research-culture-statement/
8 Science Europe. A values framework for the organisation of research. 2022. [Internet] Accessed 27 Sep 2022 from: https://scienceeurope.org/our-resources/research-culture-values-framework/
9 NIH. ACD Working Group on Changing the Culture to End Sexual Harassment. [Internet] Accessed 22 Nov 2023 from: https://acd.od.nih.gov/working-groups/sexual-harassment.html
9 University of Cambridge. Data Champions. [Internet] Accessed 21 Nov 2023 from https://www.data.cam.ac.uk/intro-data-champions
10 Science, Innovation and Technology Committee, UK Parliament. Reproducibility and Research Integrity. Sixth Report of Session 2022-23; 2023 May 10.[Internet] Accessed 24 Nov 2023 from: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5803/cmselect/cmsctech/101/report.html
11 Science, Innovation and Technology Committee, UK Parliament. Reproducibility and Research Integrity. Sixth Report of Session 2022-23; 2023 May 10.[Internet] Accessed 24 Nov 2023 from: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm5803/cmselect/cmsctech/101/report.html