The Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research (2007) (the Code) was published in 2007 and is currently under review by its co-authors, namely National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), the Australian Research Council (ARC) and Universities Australia (UA).
NHMRC, ARC and UA are proposing to streamline the Code into a principles-based document that will be supported by guides that provide advice and requirements for implementation of the Code. The first guide is on managing and investigating potential breaches of the Code. Subsequent guides will be developed based in part on advice received during public consultation and on relevant areas of Part A of the existing Code.
This new approach has been informed by extensive consultation with the research sector and advice from the Code Review Committee (CoRC) chaired by Professor Mike Calford) and the Better Practice Guides (BPG) working group (chaired by Dr Karolyn White). Information on the review and the committee members can be found below.
Date of last update: November 2017
Public consultation on the draft Code and draft Guide on investigating and managing potential breaches of the Code (the first Guide) closed on 28 February 2017. The draft documents and background material can still be accessed from the NHMRC Public Consultation website.
Around 90 submissions were received during public consultation on the review of the Code. The CoRC and BPG working group have considered all the comments received during public consultation. They have provided advice to the co-authors about revisions to the draft Code and Guide. NHMRC, ARC and UA are seeking advice from the sector to ensure the latest changes are clear and can be implemented.
The date of release for the final revised Code and first Guide is expected to be in early to mid 2018.
Until release of the final documents, institutions should continue to base their processes on the guidance in the current 2007 Code.
NHMRC, ARC and UA recognise the importance of engaging with the Australian research community, including research institutions, researchers, other funding bodies and academies, to ensure the principles-based Code and supporting guides are relevant across the broad range of research institutions. A webinar was held on 29 November 2016 for NHMRC- and ARC-funded institutions to coincide with the release of the draft documents for public consultation. The webinar aimed to explain the new approach and inform submissions, and is available below for general viewing.
The Code Review Committee (CoRC)
To assist with the review of the Code, the NHMRC has established a Code Review Committee (CoRC) under section 39 of the National Health and Medical Research Council Act 1992 (NHMRC Act). The members of the committee were selected to ensure appropriate expertise in the key areas of research integrity, administration and management across a range of different research institutions and research disciplines.
NHMRC asked each CoRC member to document their interests prior to appointment and to consider perceived interests as well as real interests. Throughout the project members are required to inform NHMRC of any changes to their interests. Management strategies are put in place as needed.
CoRC terms of reference
The Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research 2007 (the Code) is co-authored by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), the Australian Research Council (ARC) and Universities Australia (UA). The Code Review Committee (CoRC) has been re-established to advise the co-authors on the current review of the Code. The Terms of Reference for the extended term are that CoRC will:
- provide expert advice to NHMRC, ARC and UA on revisions to the Code
- provide expert advice to NHMRC, ARC and UA on the development of supporting guides to the Code, including the first Guide to investigating and managing potential breaches of the Code
- review products developed by the Better Practice Guides Working Group
- consider submissions received from consultation processes on draft Codes and draft Guides
- perform other functions related to the review as directed by the NHMRC CEO.
This CoRC will receive secretariat support from the NHMRC. The term of the CoRC has been extended from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2017.
Members of the Code Review Committee
Professor Mike Calford (Chair)
|Provost, University of Tasmania|
Professor Mike Brooks
|Deputy Vice-Chancellor Research, University of Adelaide|
Professor Andrew Davidson
|Medical Director, Melbourne Children’s Trials Centre, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute|
|Emeritus Professor Toni Makkai||Former Dean, College of Arts and Social Sciences, Australian National University|
Scientia Professor Philip Mitchell AM
|Head, School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales|
Dr Paul Taylor (from February 2016)
|Director, Research Integrity, Governance and Systems, RMIT University|
Dr Karolyn White
|Director, Research Ethics and Integrity, Macquarie University|
|Dr Sarah Winch (from December 2016)||Head of the Discipline of Medical Ethics, Law and Professionalism, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland|
|Emeritus Professor Janice Reid AC (to 31 December 2016)||Former Vice-Chancellor and President, Western Sydney University|
|Professor Mandy Thomas (to 7 August 2017)||Executive Dean, Creative Industries Faculty, Queensland University of Technology|
The CoRC’s current disclosures of interest are available below:
The Better Practice Guides (BPG) working group
To assist with the development of the guides that support the Code, the NHMRC has established a BPG working group under section 39 of the NHMRC Act 1992. Members of the BPG working group have direct, practical experience of key issues related to the implementation of research integrity policies, in particular with managing and investigating allegations of breaches to the Code. The BPG working group contains representatives from different research institutions and the National Tertiary Education Union.
Similar to the appointment of CoRC members, members of the BPG working group were asked to document their interests prior to appointment, and to inform NHMRC of any changes to their interests throughout the project. Management strategies are put in place as needed.
BPG working group terms of reference
The Terms of Reference for the Better Practice Guides Working Group are:
- Consider the submissions provided as part of consultation processes that are relevant to the better practice guides and supplementary reference material.
- Consider policies of institutions in Australia on implementation of the Code.
- Consider international approaches to research integrity that are relevant to the development of the better practice guides and supplementary reference material.
- Identify components of the Code that should be included in the better practice guides and supplementary reference material and assist in their development for consideration by the CoRC. The guides may include prescriptive guidance, case studies, references to other sources of information and templates for policies.
The Better Practice Guides Working Group will receive secretariat support from the NHMRC. The working group will develop drafts (either directly or via an independent contractor) of the better practice guides and supplementary reference material and provide these as required by the CoRC.
Members of the Better Practice Guides working group
|Name||Relevant Professional and Organisational Experience|
|Dr Karolyn White (Chair)||
Director, Research Ethics and Integrity,
|Leonie Cullen||Research Support Manager,
Baker IDI Heart & Diabetes Institute
|Dr Catherine Gangell||Manager, Research Integrity,
Professor Matthew Gillespie
Associate Dean (Research Strategy)
|Dr Jane Jacobs||Director, Office of Research Ethics and Integrity,
Queensland University of Technology
|Dr Susan O’Brien||Research Integrity Manager,
The University of Queensland
National Tertiary Education Union
The BPG working group’s current disclosures of interest are available below:
For enquiries about the Code Review, please contact email@example.com